<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soft Spots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.babiesonline.com/articles/baby/softspots.asp/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.babiesonline.com/articles/baby/softspots.asp</link>
	<description>Babies Online Articles and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:34:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is it a must to cover 2mth plus baby's head?</title>
		<link>http://www.babiesonline.com/articles/baby/softspots.asp/comment-page-1#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>Is it a must to cover 2mth plus baby's head?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.56/articles/baby/softspots.asp#comment-854</guid>
		<description>[...] a must to cover 2mth plus baby&#039;s head?   Hmm... I went ard to check and at last found this webby. Soft Spots &#124; Baby &#124; Baby, Pregnancy, and Parenting at Babies Online  It says the soft spot is still not closed yet. But ang mo is saying just take care no such thing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a must to cover 2mth plus baby&#8217;s head?   Hmm&#8230; I went ard to check and at last found this webby. Soft Spots | Baby | Baby, Pregnancy, and Parenting at Babies Online  It says the soft spot is still not closed yet. But ang mo is saying just take care no such thing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
